Animal+Testing+Lacey+T

media type="custom" key="18404772" Animal testing should only be used when needed, and when we do test we shouldn’t use the animals we don’t have a lot of.

Animals should NOT be tested on, the United States is loosing animals and some animals are going in stink. But if we didn’t test on animals, how would we get the drugs we need for when were sick? If we didn’t test on animals it would be harder for us to get better once we get sick. So the biggest argument people have is, “It’s The Humans or Animals.”

United States has strict safety tests for animals. Someone will always be the first human tested on for drugs. Currently there is no approved medicine to treat ischemic.

United States makes human trials more risky. FDA shows to be 92% effected for animals. Animal free tests can only determine if a product causes an allergy, but not the severity of the allergy.

United States has Animal - free tests can only determine if a product causes an allergy, but not the severity of the allergy. Enhanced clearance of dying cells. Medicine that might reduce the risk of developing is chemia injury. Reducing role in product testing.

It is safe to test on animals to see if drug products are safe and don’t have bad side effects and to assure the drugs will be okay for human use. If we didn’t test on animals we wouldn’t be able to know if drugs are safe on humans and if your sick the drug could make you sicker than you already are.

We should not have animal testing because, it can hurt animals and we have fewer and fewer animals each year and testing on animals can make them disappear and they’ll be no more animals.