Nuclear+Power+Hunter+W


 * [[image:thought_bubble_tns.png]] ||< =**WWW.DailyThought.blog/UK** =

NUKE POWER IS NOT BAD OR IS IT? || || 1. It produces less green house gases (another intelligent Phrase). From what I know green house gases have to do with global warming (which I don't think it true) but, its bad in one way or the next. Well...it helps with lowering that. ||  ||
 * [[image:066_27663_tns.png]] ||< I Have noticed a lot of chatter on the web about nuclear energy (wow a big boy phrase). This is my side on this problem. I've done my research and here's my side of the story. These are the reasons why i think its ok, here's my reasons. ||  ||
 * Nuclear Info ||< = =
 * Nuclear Info ||< = =
 * Nuclear Info ||< = =
 * ||< 2. It produces more power than TWO coal plants and energy cost less than a wind turbine to produce power. I think thats good all around. ||  ||
 * [[image:danger_sign_b1_tns.png]] ||< Yet every silver lining has another cloud, just like every Empire has a colony beak off because of taxes, but do you really think we can have nuke power forever? Here are my reasons. ||  ||
 * =  ||< 1. It can cause massive damage IF the plant gets a meltdown and the waste has a half-life of 1 million years. (i'm not exaggerating!) ||=   ||
 * ||< 2. It causes the local area and the workers to get radioactivenees (if thats a word). It just not right for that kind of energy seeing people with three arms and dogs with three heads. I bet they are able to contain it. It not going to work in the long run. ||  ||
 * ||< So over all i'm leaning torrid it to be a good thing in short term, why because I would like to see my electric bill go down, but in 20 years! (Oh-No) Just like I said everything has a bad side, but having a low energy bill will help us a lot. So to sum this stuff up nuke power is a good thing, I have a low energy bill and my dog has three heads. Just like I will glow like a glow stick. || [[image:bill_coins_184350_tns.png]] ||
 * [[image:copmuter.png]] ||< Thanks again for following WWW.DailyThought.blog/UK this was Daily Thought bloger William Stugs. Have a safe search. || [[image:copmuter.png]] ||
 * || Nuclear Power Is Not Bad
 * ||< So over all i'm leaning torrid it to be a good thing in short term, why because I would like to see my electric bill go down, but in 20 years! (Oh-No) Just like I said everything has a bad side, but having a low energy bill will help us a lot. So to sum this stuff up nuke power is a good thing, I have a low energy bill and my dog has three heads. Just like I will glow like a glow stick. || [[image:bill_coins_184350_tns.png]] ||
 * [[image:copmuter.png]] ||< Thanks again for following WWW.DailyThought.blog/UK this was Daily Thought bloger William Stugs. Have a safe search. || [[image:copmuter.png]] ||
 * || Nuclear Power Is Not Bad
 * || Nuclear Power Is Not Bad

Nuclear power ... what comes to mind ... meltdowns, radioactive waste, and a means to harm people, than a safe energy source. Well for many years governments, eco-scientists, and everyday people regarded Nuclear power as a bad thing. Nuclear power plants has been a problem ever sense the 70s to today. Anything nuclear must mean trouble but, with new research and nuclear companies fixing problems on this risky power source it isn't half bad at all. Nuclear power is a safe and cheap power source.

Safety, safety, safety its the number one rule that nuclear companies under took so there could be less meltdowns, and more energy output. Everyone is still concerned with the 2nd generation of reactors, when 3rd generation are being constructed with the first reactor General Electric ABWR issued in Japan in 1997. (it not one of the reactors that melted down in 2011) Which is the new AP1000 type of nuclear reactors. The 1970s and 80s reactors had plant problems such as design flaws, where NRC (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) under took a throe review of every reactor, and found Non-uniformed designs, where each reactor had different designs and most had custom parts, also having an affect on the capital cost of most reactors. Also depending on two types of licenses. One is the build license and the other to operate, most reactors never got to operate so most reactor companies went bankrupted.

Also the build time and cost is a major problem for most old reactors where some are still being constructed even though construction started in the 1970s or 80s. With the AP1000 it has a constructing maximum of 3 years, because it has no custom parts and was designed with no flaws. Like the NRC said was that all reactors had custom build and design flaws, not to mention how much each custom part would be and how long it would take to put it on. Most advanced PWR reactors, AP1000, cost 1,400 to 3,500 USD per KW and 1.6 cents per KWHR and thats not a lot of money in the power industries, and provides cheaper electricity than wind power, and has more out put than TWO coal plants, and cost less too! Also every AP1000 reactor has a life of 60 to 80 years, and can have 1 GW of power. It takes 30 million to decommission one reactor that mights seem a lot but if you were a reactor running for 60 years thats not a lot.

Waste is a non-avoidable issue for most power plants of any type, but nuclear power is tackling that problem. With current and new plants all of them produce low green gas affects. Also with new methods of nuclear waste disposal are being made to lower the radiation. An Australian scientist have also made a liquid, the ND 1B-1 helps lower the radiation of a nuclear coil as it is stored in uninhabited manmade lakes or underground. This is why nuclear power Is a safe and cheap power source. Don’t stick on the past of reactors, look to the future of them and you won’t find them half bad at all. Speaking of a plant why don’t you allow that plant to be built near Western Iowa and you wont regret it. ||  ||